The
Joint Administration/Faculty Association
Committee
to consider University Financial Matters
and
to discuss and negotiate matters
related
to Terms and Conditions
of
Employment of Faculty
|
4 February 2002
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT: |
Faculty
Members Participating in the Career Progress/Merit Scheme
The
Joint Administration/Faculty Association Committee
Peter Sutherland (Chair), Alan Harrison, Karen Belaire (for the Administration)
Tom Davison, Lorraine Allan, Bernadette Lynn (for the Association)
Report
on the Status of the Faculty Remuneration Negotiations |
The
current Tripartite Agreement specifies the procedures under which our negotiations
are carried out, and requires us to report on the progress of our deliberations
as of 1 February, the date that concludes the period designated as Phase
I. It is in this context that we now write.
Before
turning to the report—which will be quite brief—it is worth noting that
Phase II runs from now until 15 March 2002, by which time we are to have
reached agreement or be prepared for final offer selection. All of
us hope to avoid the latter.
Here
are the points upon which the Joint Committee has already achieved consensus:
The importance of the Career Progress/Merit scheme. The initial proposals
from the two sides were very similar, and the final agreement will provide
for 120 to 130 CP/M units for every 100 faculty members.
Tuition bursary benefit. The Joint Committee recognizes that it is
now University policy to provide a tuition bursary benefit of up to $3000
per academic year for a dependent of any McMaster employee for study at
McMaster; the total cost of this benefit to the University is no longer
capped for the Association's members. Thus, what remains appropriate
for discussion in our negotiations is any scheme that would provide tuition
relief to the dependents of McMaster faculty for study at other institutions.
Pension holiday. The Joint Committee agrees that any extension or
modification of the current partial pension holiday, because it applies
to all McMaster employees, is not a matter for negotiation but is rather
one for discussion by the Pension Trust Committee.
The importance of providing or upgrading desktop computers (and peripherals),
especially for faculty who are eligible to apply to SSHRC for research
support. The administration has agreed to investigate a method of
addressing this issue (e.g., by using the existing Arts Research Board
as the vehicle).
As the
second phase of negotiations gets underway, both parties look forward to
continuing in the collegial spirit that marked Phase I. The administration
representatives are grateful to the MUFA members of the Joint Committee
for suggesting that the new Provost, Ken Norrie, be allowed to participate
as an observer (without vote).
On
behalf of the Joint Committee,
Peter
Sutherland
Acting
President |
Tom
Davison
President,
Faculty Association |
 |